QUALITY BY DESIGN DRIVEN ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION

Authors

  • VRUSHALI SACHIN TAMBE Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, PES Modern College of Pharmacy (for Ladies), Maharashtra, India.
  • ARCHANA MUKUL KARNIK Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Indira College of Pharmacy, Maharashtra, India.
  • REKHA BHALERAO Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, PES Modern College of Pharmacy (for Ladies), Maharashtra, India.
  • PRIYANKA MARTAND KOKATE Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, PES Modern College of Pharmacy (for Ladies), Maharashtra, India.
  • PRERNA DONGARE Department of Pharmacognosy, Suryadatta College of Pharmacy, Maharashtra, India.

Keywords:

validation, specificity, precision, linearity, LOQ and LOD, QbD

Abstract

Introduction of efficient chromatographic and modified spectral techniques has revolutionized analytical method development. There is a rapid and continuous growth in the field of pharmaceutical analysis which has expedited solving the complex analytical problems with improved sensitivity and selectivity in estimation. Analytical method development and validation is an integral part of drug and formulation development and remains vital throughout its lifetime. Analytical methods are developed as quality indicating parameter for new molecules, formulations, process, residues analysis, degradation studies and impurity profiling. This review focuses on understanding and implementing the validation guidelines for analytical methods. Evidently, the concept of quality by design has paved its way in the last decade for in-depth understanding of the method. Moreover, it helps in the development of a robust method and thereby boost confidence in estimation. The current review article discusses various analytical method validation parameters, the way to perform those studies, acceptance criteria for each parameter and the importance and implementation of quality by design in analytical method development and validation and gives insight about the recent publication trends in this regard. From the publication trend of a decade, a significant rise in the analytical method development based on quality based design was observed.

References

Ameeduzzafar, El-Bagory, I., Alruwaili, N.K., Imam, S.S., Alomar, F.A., Elkomy, M.H., Ahmad, N., Elmowafy, M. (2020): Quality by design (QbD) based development and validation of bioanalytical RP-HPLC method for dapagliflozin: forced degradation and preclinical pharmacokinetic study. – Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 43(1-2): 53-65.

Araujo, P. (2009): Key aspects of analytical method validation and linearity evaluation. – Journal of chromatography B 877(23): 2224-2234.

Asu, S.P., Sompalli, N.K., Mohan, A.M., Deivasigamani, P. (2021): Chromatographic separation of fluoroquinolone drugs and drug degradation profile monitoring through quality-by-design concept. – Journal of Chromatographic Science 59(1): 55-63.

Beg, S., Malik, A.K., Afzal, O., Altamimi, A.S.A., Kazmi, I., Al-Abbasi, F.A., Almalki, W.H., Barkat, M.A., Kawish, S.M., Pradhan, D.P., Rahman, M. (2021): Systematic development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for estimation of abiraterone acetate and its degradation products. – Journal of Chromatographic Science 59(1): 79-87.

Chapter, G. (2007): 1225, Validation of compendial methods. – United States Pharmacopeia 30, National Formulary 25, Rockville, Md., USA, The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. Inc., USP 5p.

Chawathe, A.S., Hamrapurkar, P.D. (2020): Implementation of Quality by Design Approach for Analytical Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Prucalopride Succinate in the Bulk and Solid Dosage Form. – J. Pharm. Qual. Assur. 11(4): 510-517.

Elhawi, M.M., Hassan, W.S., El-Sheikh, R., El-Sayed, H.M. (2020): Multivariate analysis of perampanel in pharmaceutical formulations using RP-HPLC. – Chromatographia 83: 1335-1343.

Ellwanger, J.B., Wingert, N.R., Volpato, N.M., Garcia, C.V., Schapoval, E.E., Steppe, M. (2020): Analytical quality by design approach for a stability-indicating method to determine apixaban and its related impurities. – Chromatographia 83: 65-75.

Ferenczi-Fodor, K., Renger, B., Végh, Z. (2010): The frustrated reviewer-recurrent failures in manuscripts describing validation of quantitative TLC/HPTLC procedures for analysis of pharmaceuticals. – JPC-Journal of Planar Chromatography-Modern TLC 23(3): 173-179.

Food and Drug Administration (2000): Draft Guidance for Industry on Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Documentation; Availability. – Fed. Regist 65(169): 52776-52777.

Gad, M.A., Amer, S.M., Zaazaa, H.E., Hassan, S.A. (2020): Strategies for stabilizing formulation and QbD assisted development of robust stability indicating method of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone. – Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 178: 8p.

Ganorkar, A.V., Askarkar, S.S., Gupta, K.R., Umekar, M.J. (2020): Validated stability indicating and assay method development of linagliptin in formulation by RP-HPLC using quality by design. – Orbital: The Electronic Journal of Chemistry 13p.

González, A.G., Herrador, M.Á. (2007): A practical guide to analytical method validation, including measurement uncertainty and accuracy profiles. – TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 26(3): 227-238.

Green, J.M. (1996): Peer reviewed: a practical guide to analytical method validation. – Analytical Chemistry 68(9): 305A-309A.

Hakiem, A.F.A., Hamdy, A.K., Ali, H.R.H., Gomaa, M., Aboraia, A.S. (2021): In depth investigation of the retention behavior of structurally related β-blockers on RP-HPLC column: Quality by design and quantitative structure-property relationship complementary approaches for optimization and validation. – Journal of Chromatography B 1166: 12p.

Hubert, C., Lebrun, P., Houari, S., Ziemons, E., Rozet, E., Hubert, P. (2014): Improvement of a stability-indicating method by Quality-by-Design versus Quality-by-Testing: A case of a learning process. – Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 88: 401-409.

ICH, I. (2005): Q2 (R1): Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. – In International conference on harmonization, Geneva 13p.

JENA, B.R., PANDA, S.P., KULANDAIVELU, U., ALAVALA, R.R., RAO, G.K., SWAIN, S., GHOSE, D., PRADHAN, D.P. (2021): A QbD based study in development, optimization and forced degradation behaviour of Epinastine Hydrochloride in Metered dose inhaler by RP-HPLC. – International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 13(1): 10p.

Manoel, J.W., Primieri, G.B., Bueno, L.M., Wingert, N.R., Volpato, N.M., Garcia, C.V., Schapoval, E.E.S., Steppe, M. (2020): The application of quality by design in the development of the liquid chromatography method to determine empagliflozin in the presence of its organic impurities. – RSC Advances 10(12): 7313-7320.

Mohan, T.J., Jogia, H.A., Mukkanti, K. (2020): Novel stability-indicating UHPLC method development and validation for the quantification of perindopril, amlodipine and their impurities in pharmaceutical formulations: Application of QbD approach. – Chromatographia 83(10): 1197-1220.

Palakurthi, A.K., Dongala, T., Katakam, L.N.R. (2020): QbD based development of HPLC method for simultaneous quantification of Telmisartan and Hydrochlorothiazide impurities in tablets dosage form. – Practical Laboratory Medicine 21: 11p.

Papadoyannis, I.N., Samanidou, V.F. (2004): Validation of HPLC instrumentation. – Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 27(5): 753-783.

Parab Gaonkar, V., Hullatti, K. (2021): Quality assessment and RP-HPLC method development for estimation of curcuminoids in Curcuma longa: A Quality by Design approach. – Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 44(1-2): 95-102.

Patel, M., Kothari, C. (2020a): Comprehensive stability-indicating method development of Avanafil Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor using advanced Quality-by-Design approach. – Journal of Analytical Science and Technology 11: 1-14.

Patel, M.N., Kothari, C.S. (2020b): Multivariate UV-chemometric and HPLC-QbD method for simultaneous estimation of vardenafil and dapoxetine in active pharmaceutical ingredients and its marketed formulation. – Current Analytical Chemistry 16(3): 263-276.

Patel, M.N., Patel, A.J., Shah, U.H., Patel, S.G. (2021): Correction to: Comparative Study of the UV-Chemometrics, Ratio Spectra Derivative and HPLC-QbD Methods for the Simultaneous Estimation of Carisoprodol, Paracetamol and Caffeine in Its Triple Combination Formulation CARISOMA. – Chromatographia 84: 313-313.

Patil, K.D., Bagade, S.B., Bonde, S.C. (2020): QbD-enabled stability-indicating assay method for the estimation of linezolid in newly developed gelatin nanoparticles for anti-tubercular therapy. – Chromatographia 83(8): 963-973.

Rozet, E., Ceccato, A., Hubert, C., Ziemons, E., Oprean, R., Rudaz, S., Boulanger, B., Hubert, P. (2007): Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation. – Journal of Chromatography A 1158(1-2): 111-125.

Saini, S., Sharma, T., Patel, A., Kaur, R., Tripathi, S.K., Katare, O.P., Singh, B. (2020): QbD-steered development and validation of an RP-HPLC method for quantification of ferulic acid: Rational application of chemometric tools. – Journal of Chromatography B 1155: 13p.

Taverniers, I., De Loose, M., Van Bockstaele, E. (2004): Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. – TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 23(8): 535-552.

Vial, J., Jardy, A. (1999): Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. – Analytical Chemistry 71(14): 2672-2677.

Yabré, M., Ferey, L., Somé, T.I., Sivadier, G., Gaudin, K. (2020): Development of a green HPLC method for the analysis of artesunate and amodiaquine impurities using Quality by Design. – Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 190: 10p.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

QUALITY BY DESIGN DRIVEN ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION. (2023). Quantum Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 2(4), 7-17. https://qjmhs.com/index.php/qjmhs/article/view/48