EVALUATING THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE NIJMEGEN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Authors

  • ELNAZ SHARIATPANAHI Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • AMIN KASHANI Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • ERFAN AYUBI Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  • SEYEDE FARANAK EMAMI Department of Audiology, Hearing Disorder Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Keywords:

cochlear implantation, life, questionnaire, patients

Abstract

The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) is designed to evaluate the quality of life of cochlear implant (CI) patients. This questionnaire evaluates basic voice perception, advanced voice perception, talking and speech production, self-confidence, social activity and social interactions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the NCIQ Questionnaire. The present case-control study included 100 post-lingual patients with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss (case group), who underwent CI surgery and 100 patients (control group), who were on the waiting list. At first, the English version of questionnaire was translated into Persian language. Its validity was confirmed and Pearson correlation analysis was used for its internal reliability in different domains. The validity and reliability of questionnaire was proven. The mean scores of the case group were better than the control group in all questions based on the level of education (Pv=0.000). The differences in mean scores of case group with right ear prosthesis were greater than that of them with left ear, in the areas of activity (p-value=0.049), social interactions (p-value=0.039) and self-confidence (P=0.043). Therefore, the NCIQ in Persian language is a valid measure to evaluate health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant users. The NCIQ is a valid and reliable tool for examining various aspects of the quality of life of Persian-speaking cochlear implant patients.

References

Emami, S.F. (2020): Comparison of Word Recognition Score in White Noise in Patients with Cochlear Implant Prosthesis toward Patients with Hearing Aid. – Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine 27(3): 171-177.

Emami, S.F., Abdoli, A. (2019): Cortical auditory evoked potentials in children with auditory Neuropathy/Dys-Synchrony. – Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 71: 238-242.

Emami, S.F., Shariatpanahi, E., Gohari, N., Mehrabifard, M. (2023): Aging and speech-in-noise perception. – Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 75(3): 1579-1585.

Hashemi, S.B., Monshizadeh, L. (2011): The quality of life in pre-lingual deaf children after 1.5 years of cochlear implantation from the point of view of parents in Shiraz, Iran. – Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 13(6): 431-433.

Hinderink, J.B., Krabbe, P.F., Van Den Broek, P. (2000): Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. – Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 123(6): 756-765.

Kamel Attar KAR, N., Khalkhli, V., Amiri Majd, M. (2019): Comparison of Executive Function and Educational Satisfaction in Primary School Students with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impaired with and without Cochlear Implanted. – The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 8(2): 200-209.

Klop, W.M.C., Boermans, P.P., Ferrier, M.B., van den Hout, W.B., Stiggelbout, A.M., Frijns, J.H. (2008): Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. – Otology & Neurotology 29(5): 615-621.

Mo, B., Lindbæk, M., Harris, S. (2005): Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. – Ear and Hearing 26(2): 186-194.

Roland, L., Fischer, C., Tran, K., Rachakonda, T., Kallogjeri, D., Lieu, J.E. (2016): Quality of life in children with hearing impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. – Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 155(2): 208-219.

Soltani Shal, R., Karshki, H., Aghamohamadiyan, H.R., Abdkhodaei, M.S., Bafandeh, H. (2011): Evaluation of validity and reliability of the quality of school life questionnaire in Mashhad schools. – Journal of Kerman University of medical sciences 18(1): 79-93.

Spencer, L.J., Tomblin, J.B., Gantz, B.J. (2012): Growing up with a cochlear implant: Education, vocation, and affiliation. – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(4): 483-498.

Vermeire, K., Brokx, J.P., Wuyts, F.L., Cochet, E., Hofkens, A., Van de Heyning, P.H. (2005): Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. – Otology & Neurotology 26(2): 188-195.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-20

How to Cite

SHARIATPANAHI, E., KASHANI, A., AYUBI, E., & EMAMI, S. F. (2024). EVALUATING THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE NIJMEGEN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION QUESTIONNAIRE. Quantum Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(4), 67–73. Retrieved from https://qjmhs.com/index.php/qjmhs/article/view/93

Issue

Section

Articles